Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
polotab.com currently scores 30/100 for AEO readiness, indicating limited machine-readability despite strong content volume. Core technical foundations for AI retrieval are missing, including llms.txt (0), Schema.org structured data (0), canonical tags (0), and AI permissions signals (0). The site does show some positive crawl signals, such as a valid sitemap with 82 URLs (score 7) and strong fact density (score 8), but freshness and authority reinforcement remain weak with no lastmod timestamps, no author/entity schema, and no explicit NAP consistency.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.