Weak AI visibility with 4 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
revyl.com has a strong technical baseline for crawl access (HTTPS enabled, robots.txt and sitemap both returning 200, and 7,180 characters of indexable homepage text), but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. The largest blockers are foundational discoverability gaps: no `llms.txt` (404), no JSON-LD schema of any kind, no canonical tags, and no dedicated FAQ endpoint (`/faq` returns 404). Content is present but poorly structured for AI extraction, with zero question headings, zero direct answer pairs, and no list/table formatting patterns. Overall, the site is currently under-signaling authority, freshness, and machine-readable context despite having enough content volume to improve quickly.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.