Weak AI visibility with 2 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
rid.me has foundational crawl access and canonical hygiene, but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. The homepage serves over HTTPS, has title/meta description, and a valid self-referencing canonical URL, yet core machine-readable signals are absent: /llms.txt returns 404, /sitemap.xml returns 404, no JSON-LD schema is present, and no AI-permission file is detected. Content extraction signals are also weak, with 0 H1 tags, 0 internal links, 0 question headings, and no list/table structures for answer parsing. With high-priority technical additions and structured content formatting, the site can move quickly from discoverable to citable in AI search workflows.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.