Weak AI visibility with 12 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
roark.ai has a solid technical foundation for AI discovery, but its current AEO readiness is constrained by missing AI-specific guidance and answer-oriented content structure. The site is crawlable and well-formed (HTTPS enabled, semantic HTML elements present, canonical configured, and 2 JSON-LD blocks with Organization and WebSite schema), yet critical assets like /llms.txt and /ai.txt are absent (both missing; /llms.txt returns HTTP 404). Content signals are present but under-optimized for citation workflows, with no question-format headings, no FAQPage schema, and limited direct-answer paragraphs despite substantial accessible text.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.