Weak AI visibility with 4 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
runcaptain.com shows a usable technical foundation for crawlability (HTTPS enabled, title/meta present, 24 internal links, and strong alt-text coverage at 31/32 images), but AEO readiness is currently low at an overall score of 25. Core machine-readable discovery signals are missing: `/llms.txt` (404), `/robots.txt` (404), `/sitemap.xml` (404), and no JSON-LD schema blocks at all. Content exists but is not packaged for answer engines, with zero question headings, no direct Q&A pairs, no canonical tag, and no freshness markup (`<time>` count 0 and no datePublished/dateModified). The site has a real opportunity to improve citation likelihood quickly by implementing foundational files and structured answer formatting.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.