Moderate AI visibility with 23 of 40 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Healthcare & Patient AdvocacyMental Health CareVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 54/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Canonical URL Strategy, and Duplicate Content Blocks. Priority gaps: Comprehensive FAQ Section, Speakable Schema, and Q&A Content Format. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI36
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 40 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI can't see your images. It reads the markup around them. A product photo with alt="image1.jpg" tells AI nothing. A figure with a descriptive figcaption and 8-word alt text tells AI exactly what it's looking at - and that context feeds directly into citation decisions.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.