Weak AI visibility with 16 of 34 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Developer Tools & InfrastructureDeveloper PlatformsVerdict
Critical AEO gaps at 36/100 - seesaw.me is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include RSS/Atom Feed, Schema Coverage & Depth, and Schema.org Structured Data. Priority gaps: llms.txt File, Q&A Content Format, and Comprehensive FAQ Section.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI32
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 34 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.