Weak AI visibility with 10 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: rss/atom feed.
Verdict
sendblue.com has a mixed AEO profile with a 49/100 overall score: the foundation is strong, but extractability and freshness signals are weak. Core strengths include `llms.txt` (10/10, 19,216 characters), structured data basics (9/10, Organization + WebSite schema), and clean crawlable HTML/internal linking (9/10 and 8/10, with 28 internal links). The largest blockers are FAQ and answer architecture (2/10 and 3/10), freshness and publishing signals (2/10 with no `lastmod` dates), and multiple missing machine-readable formats (RSS 0/10, tables/lists 0/10, definition patterns 0/10). In practice, this means AI systems can find the site, but have limited structured evidence to quote, attribute, and keep current.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
You published a great blog post in January. It's now February and nothing else has appeared. AI engines notice -and they're crawling less often because of it.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.