Weak AI visibility with 8 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
serafis.ai has a solid technical base for crawl access (HTTPS enabled, robots.txt and sitemap reachable, canonical configured), but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. Core machine-readable signals are missing: `https://serafis.ai/llms.txt` returns 404, no JSON-LD schema types are present, and there is no RSS/Atom feed or AI permissions file. Content is substantial (147,582 text characters) and data-rich (175 quantitative data points), yet extractability is weak due to zero question headings, no direct Q&A structure, only 2 internal links, and missing semantic/date markup. Overall, the site has usable content depth but lacks the structured packaging AI engines rely on for reliable citation and answer generation.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.