Weak AI visibility with 24 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Verdict
Critical AEO gaps at 36/100 - sharpe.sh is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include llms.txt File, robots.txt for AI Crawlers, and Canonical URL Strategy. Priority gaps: Q&A Content Format, RSS/Atom Feed, and Table & List Extractability. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI43
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your comparison table looks great in the browser. But it's built with divs and CSS Grid, so ChatGPT sees a blob of text. Here's what that costs you.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.