Weak AI visibility with 1 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
sizeless.co is currently not AEO-ready, with an overall score of 5/100 and 18 of 22 criteria marked MISSING. Core machine-readability signals are absent, including llms.txt (404), robots.txt (404), sitemap.xml (404), and all JSON-LD schema (0 blocks found). Content is also not extractable for answer engines: no H1, no FAQ content, no direct Q&A formatting, no lists/tables, and no fact-based data points. The only partial positives are HTTPS and basic title/meta description presence, which are not enough to support modern AI discovery and citation.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.