Weak AI visibility with 8 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: schema.org structured data.
Verdict
slickerhq.com currently scores 37/100 for AEO readiness, with strong foundations in canonicalization (10/10), llms.txt (10/10), and fact density (8/10 with 131 quantitative data points). However, core machine-interpretation layers are missing: Schema.org structured data and schema depth both score 0/10, and no RSS/Atom feed or AI licensing signals are present (0/10 each). Content is substantial and research-led, but extractability and answer formatting are weak, including direct answer paragraphs (2/10), definition patterns (0/10), and table/list extractability (0/10). In short, the site has high-value material but lacks the structured packaging AI systems use to confidently parse, cite, and rank responses.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.