Moderate AI visibility with 11 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: rss/atom feed.
Verdict
stormy.ai shows a solid technical foundation for AI discoverability, with strong crawl controls (`llms.txt` 200 status at 4,793 characters, `robots.txt` 200 with explicit GPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot/ChatGPT allowances) and excellent indexation depth (2,308 sitemap URLs). Canonicalization and publishing velocity are also strong, including a self-referencing HTTPS canonical and 952 URLs updated in the last 90 days. However, citation readiness is constrained by shallow on-page schema breadth (homepage schema limited to `Organization`), weak answer formatting (no direct Q→A pairs), and weak authority packaging (no Person schema, no case studies, no source attributions). The site is operationally crawl-ready but content-structuring and trust signals need focused upgrades to become consistently quotable in AI answers.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Your homepage has perfect JSON-LD. Your other 200 pages? Zero. Here's how we measure the gap -and why AI engines judge your whole domain by it.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.