Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
syncly.app shows early AEO foundations but low readiness overall, with a total score of 30/100. Core technical discoverability exists (Canonical URL Strategy: 10/10, Sitemap Completeness: 7/10), but critical AI-facing controls are missing, including llms.txt (0/10), RSS/Atom feed (0/10), and AI permissions/licensing signals (0/10). Content is data-rich (Fact/Data Density: 8/10 with 284 quantitative points), yet weakly structured for answer extraction (Direct Answer Paragraphs: 2/10, FAQ: 2/10, question headings: 0). Prioritizing machine-readable governance, schema depth, and answer-first formatting would materially improve AI citation and retrieval potential.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.