Weak AI visibility with 3 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Verdict
The site has basic crawlability foundations (working sitemap, crawlable HTML, and an existing llms.txt), but core AEO signals are weak. Critical AI-answer readiness gaps include no FAQ page, no FAQ/QAPage schema, and no LocalBusiness/Organization schema on core pages. Entity trust signals are also diluted by inconsistent contact data (placeholder vs real NAP) and limited expert, data-backed content.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Most sites run default platform robots.txt with zero AI-specific rules. That's not a strategy -it's an accident. Explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot signal that your content is open for citation.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.