Weak AI visibility with 4 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
trackstarhq.com shows a solid technical foundation for crawlability (HTTPS enabled, semantic HTML elements present, single H1, and 27 internal links), but AEO readiness is currently low at an overall score of 26. Core machine-readable trust signals are missing: no JSON-LD schema, no llms.txt, no robots.txt, no sitemap.xml, no canonical tag, and no RSS feed. Content structure has partial strengths (one Q&A pattern and substantial text content), yet extractable authority signals are thin with zero quantitative data points, no FAQ page, and no expert schema. In short, the site is readable to crawlers but not yet packaged for reliable AI citation and retrieval.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.