Moderate AI visibility with 34 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Developer Tools & InfrastructureDeveloper PlatformsVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 58/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Q&A Content Format, and RSS/Atom Feed. Priority gaps: Comprehensive FAQ Section, Speakable Schema, and Owned Data Density.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI37
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
Anonymous content is untrusted content. AI engines check for author bylines, bio links, reviewer credits, and Person schema to decide whether a page comes from a credible creator. Creator Transparency measures how clearly your content identifies its authors and their qualifications.
AI can't see your images. It reads the markup around them. A product photo with alt="image1.jpg" tells AI nothing. A figure with a descriptive figcaption and 8-word alt text tells AI exactly what it's looking at - and that context feeds directly into citation decisions.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.