Weak AI visibility with 3 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: schema.org structured data.
Verdict
tryupfront.com shows very low AEO readiness with an overall score of 11/100, despite one clear strength: a well-structured llms.txt scoring 10/10. Most core AI-discovery and extractability signals are missing, including Schema.org (0), direct-answer formatting (0), semantic crawlability (0), FAQ coverage (0), and canonical URL strategy (0). The site appears extremely thin from a crawler perspective (homepage length 114 characters, text length 56, and 0 internal links), which limits AI systems' ability to interpret and trust the content. With foundational technical and content upgrades, the site can move from near-invisible to indexable and answer-ready in AI search workflows.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Most AI crawlers don't run JavaScript. If your content loads after page render -behind accordions, SPAs, or API calls -you're invisible. We've seen entire FAQ sections vanish from AI's perspective because of one accordion widget.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.