Weak AI visibility with 6 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
unitedwedream.org has solid baseline SEO/AEO infrastructure (HTTPS, XML sitemap, robots.txt, and Organization/WebPage/Breadcrumb structured data), but it is not explicitly optimized for AI crawlers yet. The site is missing `llms.txt`, has no AI-bot-specific robots directives, and lacks dedicated FAQ endpoints and FAQ/HowTo schema. It does contain useful question-style and rights-oriented content plus strong internal linking, which gives a workable foundation for higher AEO performance after technical alignment.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Most sites run default platform robots.txt with zero AI-specific rules. That's not a strategy -it's an accident. Explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot signal that your content is open for citation.
AI systems don't cite websites -they cite entities. A verifiable business with an address, named authors, and social proof. Our self-audit (88/100) still loses points here because we lack a physical address. That's how strict this criterion is.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.