Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
upliftai.org has a solid technical base for crawlability and canonicalization, but it is not yet AEO-ready in the areas that most influence AI citation. Core machine-readable trust layers are missing, including `llms.txt` (404), JSON-LD schema (0 blocks, no schema types), and `ai.txt`, while freshness and distribution signals are weak (no `<time>` elements, no sitemap `lastmod`, no RSS/Atom feed). The site does show useful strengths like HTTPS, a self-referencing canonical, semantic sections/nav usage, and high quantitative content density, but these are not yet packaged in extractable formats AI systems prefer. Closing the metadata, schema, and content-structure gaps is the fastest path to move from low visibility to reliable AI discoverability.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.