Moderate AI visibility with 14 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: rss/atom feed.
Verdict
usebear.ai shows a solid AEO technical foundation but inconsistent answer-layer execution, resulting in a moderate overall readiness profile. Core discoverability signals are strong: `llms.txt` is live with substantial structured content (HTTP 200, 18,117 characters), schema is present (`organization`, `faqpage`, `website`), canonicalization is correct, and the site is crawlable over HTTPS with semantic elements. The main gaps are freshness and governance signals: no AI crawler directives in `robots.txt`, no `ai.txt`, no RSS/Atom feed, no `datePublished`/`dateModified`, and no sitemap `lastmod` despite a valid sitemap. Content is also under-optimized for AI extraction, with only 2 question headings, no direct Q&A pairs, no tables/ordered lists, and no author `Person` schema to reinforce expertise.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your homepage has perfect JSON-LD. Your other 200 pages? Zero. Here's how we measure the gap -and why AI engines judge your whole domain by it.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
"What is AEO?" -14% of all AI queries start with "What is." If your content doesn't answer with a clean definition sentence, someone else's will.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.