Weak AI visibility with 26 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Healthcare & Patient AdvocacyHospital & Health CareVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 48/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Internal Linking Structure, and Canonical URL Strategy. Priority gaps: Comprehensive FAQ Section, Content Licensing & AI Permissions, and Speakable Schema. Topic coherence is 4/10, which caps the overall score at 55. Focusing content on core expertise areas is the single highest-impact improvement.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI44
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
You wrote a 3,000-word guide on "customer support automation." But people ask AI "how do I reduce support ticket volume?" If your content doesn't match the actual queries, AI can't connect the dots.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.