Weak AI visibility with 9 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
archil.com has a usable technical base for AEO, but it is not yet citation-ready for AI engines. Strengths include solid crawl access (HTTPS, robots.txt 200, sitemap 200 with 33 URLs), strong internal linking (33 links), and high factual density (42 quantitative data points). The biggest gaps are discoverability and machine-readable trust signals: /llms.txt returns 404, no AI policy file, schema is limited to a single Website block, and freshness/FAQ/canonical signals are incomplete.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
You published a great blog post in January. It's now February and nothing else has appeared. AI engines notice -and they're crawling less often because of it.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.