Weak AI visibility with 5 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
combinely.ai has a solid technical foundation for crawlability, with HTTPS enabled, semantic HTML elements present, and substantial indexable text (27,618 characters) available without JavaScript. However, AEO readiness is currently low (overall score 26) because core machine-readable and discovery assets are missing: no JSON-LD schema, no llms.txt (404), no robots.txt (404), no sitemap.xml (404), no canonical tags, and no RSS feed. The homepage shows useful factual density and internal navigation (13 internal links), but it lacks extractable answer structures such as FAQ content, definition patterns, and list/table formatting. In its current state, AI systems can read the site, but they are not being clearly guided to interpret, trust, and cite it.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.