Weak AI visibility with 9 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
constellationspace.ai has a baseline AEO foundation but low overall readiness at 39/100. Technical crawlability is solid in key areas, including Canonical URL Strategy (10/10), Schema.org Structured Data (9/10), and Clean, Crawlable HTML (9/10), with HTTPS, semantic sections, and valid organization/website schema present. However, major answer-layer and AI-discovery gaps are holding performance back: llms.txt (0/10), FAQ coverage (0/10), RSS/Atom feed (0/10), extractable lists/tables (0/10), definition patterns (0/10), and AI permissions/licensing (0/10). Limited content breadth (only 1 URL in sitemap and 2 internal links) further constrains discoverability and retrieval depth for AI systems.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.