Weak AI visibility with 8 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
credal.ai shows early AEO maturity with an overall score of 33/100: technical crawlability is a relative strength, but machine-readable AI signals are largely absent. The site performs well on clean HTML (9), original evidence content (8), internal linking (7), and sitemap presence (7), which gives a usable foundation. However, critical discoverability and extractability elements score 0 in multiple areas, including llms.txt, Schema.org JSON-LD, FAQ coverage, RSS/Atom, canonical tags, and schema depth. With these gaps closed, credal.ai can materially improve how reliably AI systems identify, trust, and quote its content.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.