Weak AI visibility with 11 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
deepawareai.com has a solid technical foundation for crawlability and discovery, but it is not yet structured for strong AI citation performance. Core strengths include AI-friendly robots directives (HTTP 200 with GPTBot/ClaudeBot/Anthropic allowed), valid sitemap coverage (43 URLs), strong internal linking (43 internal links), and existing LocalBusiness/WebSite schema. The biggest gaps are missing AI-specific and answer-first assets (no /llms.txt at HTTP 404, no /faq at HTTP 404, no RSS/Atom feed, no /ai.txt), plus weak answer formatting (0 question headings, no direct Q&A pairs, 4 H1 tags). Freshness and authority signals are also underpowered, with no datePublished/dateModified schema, no <time> elements, and 39 of 43 sitemap URLs sharing the same lastmod date (2025-08-14).
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.