Weak AI visibility with 2 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
delineate.pro has a minimal AEO foundation with HTTPS enabled and substantial crawlable text content (26,311 characters), but overall readiness is low because core machine-readable signals are absent. The site is missing llms.txt (404), sitemap.xml (404), FAQ page (404), canonical tags, and all JSON-LD schema (schema_block_count: 0), which severely limits AI discoverability and citation confidence. Compounding this, robots.txt explicitly blocks key AI crawlers (gptbot, claudebot), while the homepage has no internal links, no H1, and no semantic structure to help engines parse authority and intent.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.