Moderate AI visibility with 14 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
langdock.com shows mid-tier AEO readiness with an overall score of 54/100: strong technical foundations exist, but critical AI-discovery signals are missing. The site performs well in schema quality (10/10 for structured data and 10/10 for schema depth), internal linking (8/10 with 71 internal links), and factual density (8/10), which gives AI systems useful context. However, discoverability and control layers are weak or absent, including missing llms.txt (0/10), missing RSS/Atom feed (0/10), missing content licensing/AI permissions (0/10), and no practical extractability patterns like lists, tables, and definitions (all 0/10). Priority should be closing these zero-score gaps first, then improving direct-answer formatting and freshness signals.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.