Weak AI visibility with 6 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
rowflow.ai has a strong technical base for crawlability, but it is not yet AEO-ready in the areas that most influence AI citation. Core signals like canonical strategy are solid (self-referencing HTTPS canonical, score 10/10), and the site exposes substantial factual content (307 quantitative data points), but critical machine-readable layers are missing. There is no llms.txt (404), no JSON-LD schema of any kind, no FAQ endpoint at /faq (404), and no AI permissions file, which together limit discoverability and trust signals for AI engines.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.