Weak AI visibility with 10 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
uncommontherapeutics.com has a usable technical base for AEO, but readiness is currently limited (overall score: 39). Core crawl controls are in place, including a 200 robots.txt that explicitly allows key AI crawlers and a strong canonical setup, plus two JSON-LD blocks using LocalBusiness and WebSite types. The biggest gaps are missing machine-readable AI guidance and answer-ready content structure: `/llms.txt` returns 404, `/faq` returns 404, no FAQPage schema is present, and question headings count is 0 with no H1 detected. Content discoverability and freshness signals are also thin, with only 3 internal links, no RSS feed, no `<time>` elements, and no recent sitemap updates in the last 90 days.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Your homepage has perfect JSON-LD. Your other 200 pages? Zero. Here's how we measure the gap -and why AI engines judge your whole domain by it.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.