Weak AI visibility with 5 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
useautumn.com shows foundational crawlability but is not AEO-ready in its current state. The site has strong canonical setup (self-referencing HTTPS canonical) and a valid sitemap with 27 URLs, but core machine-readable trust signals are missing: `/llms.txt` returns 404, `/faq` returns 404, and no JSON-LD schema types are present. Content is text-rich and data-dense (207 quantitative points), yet extractability is weak due to no FAQ schema, no list/table structures, no definition patterns, and only 2 question-style headings. With structured data, AI-facing governance files, and answer-first content formatting, visibility and citation likelihood can improve materially.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.