Moderate AI visibility with 12 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Verdict
Vooma.com is at a mid-level AEO readiness score of 50/100: core crawlability is strong, but answer-format and governance signals are thin. The site performs well on foundational machine access signals like `llms.txt` (10/10), clean HTML (9/10), and internal linking (8/10), with useful data density (15 quantitative points; 8/10). The biggest blockers are zero-score areas that directly limit AI answer extraction and trust, including FAQ coverage, canonical tags, RSS feed availability, definition patterns, and AI licensing permissions (all 0/10). Freshness is also weak (`Content Freshness Signals` 2/10, `Publishing Velocity` 2/10) because no date metadata or sitemap `lastmod` is present.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.