Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: schema.org structured data.
Verdict
cactuscompute.com shows a solid technical base for crawlability, with HTTPS enabled, substantial indexable content (23,686 text characters), and a robust llms.txt file (HTTP 200, 55,016 characters). However, core AEO infrastructure is largely missing: no JSON-LD schema, no robots.txt (404), no sitemap.xml (404), no canonical tags, and no RSS/Atom feed. The site has some answer-oriented and data-rich signals (1 question heading and 16 quantitative data points), but entity authority, freshness markup, and structured discoverability remain underdeveloped. In its current state, the site is partially machine-readable but not yet citation-ready for AI engines at scale.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.