Weak AI visibility with 4 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
getpaloma.ai has a usable technical foundation for crawling (HTTPS enabled, semantic elements present, and substantial indexable text), but its AEO readiness is low at an overall score of 20. The site is missing core machine-readable signals: no llms.txt (404), no JSON-LD schema, no canonical tag, no FAQ page, and no RSS/Atom feed. Discoverability depth is also limited by a sparse sitemap (2 URLs, no lastmod) and very light internal linking (2 internal links). In short, the site is readable by crawlers but not yet structured for consistent AI citation and retrieval.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.