Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
syntheticsociety.ai has a workable technical baseline (HTTPS enabled, valid `robots.txt`, valid sitemap XML, and a correct self-referencing canonical), but overall AEO readiness is low at an overall score of 22. The biggest blockers are missing machine-readable guidance and structure: `/llms.txt` returns 404, no JSON-LD schema is present, and no FAQ page exists at `/faq` (404). Content is information-rich (`121` quantitative data points and strong text volume), yet it is not packaged for AI extraction due to zero question-style headings, zero direct answer pairs, missing definition patterns, and weak internal linking (only `2` internal links). In short, the site has raw content potential but lacks the structured signals AI engines use for confident citation.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.